A History of Violence

Why is everyone in the reviews saying this is good I’m so confused, the acting is like one tier above porn acting and more so the plot is just kinda stupid. The characters are all boring as hell. Like it felt like they were doing a parody of nuclear family characters for the wife and kids. They were so nothing burger. Also why was it 6 bucks to rent this movie nottttt doing that. I went into it blind just cause it’s a cronenberg and I really thought it was gonna be about the two guys at the beginning cause I feel like that would have been a way more interesting movie than this shit. Like the family is so boring so you don’t care about Joey like winning, and the other guys aren’t fleshed out enough (before they die) so it’s not like you lowkey want them to win. And I don’t mean that in a “i can’t root for the mc if he’s a bad guy way” I mean like he was so boring I could not gaf way. Make him eviler??? Eastern promises mogs this movie so hard. I kinda think cronenberg was going for a similar vibe with the two of them and either he perfected (or at least greatly improved) it with eastern promises, or the script and actors were just wayyyy better. Yk this movie feels like. It’s like a weird bad short story that like ur uncle wrote or like you find it on the printer in a public library. I can’t really explain that but I’m right.

Should’ve been a porno, not a Hollywood production—multiple extended, pointless sex scenes. Terrible dialogue, bad acting, ridiculous music and nonsensical plot points. 90% of scenes lacked any purpose whatsoever. The bullying was hysterical, feel like I got pranked—so bad.

Killers will always keep killing

I wanted to find a lesser known mob movie. Mistake.

A History of Violence moves with a deliberate slowness that feels compelling. Lots of themes of survival of the fittest, innate violence, and identity. What I mostly liked though was the cinematography.

8

B minus